Jouni Ahto wrote: > I really like the part 'Maybe its time to get invloved [typos not fixed] > into the DocBook project itself, [...]' (Jirka actually is doing exactly > that). If DocBook can't satisfy a programming projects' needs, someone is > not modeling something the right way. Currently, I refuse to have any > opinions about whether it's us or the team that defines DocBook.
There is a standard way to request new feature for DocBook. You can submit new request at: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=384107&group_id=21935&func=browse But note that DocBook process is quite slow. Changes in DTD must be announced at least one major version before they are really implemented. So proposalf for something wouldn't be part of DocBook before version 6.0 (I don't think that this version would be published earlier than two years from now). So if there is a realy strong need for some new elements or small change in content models, customizing DTD is only way to do it now and in near future. Jirka ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jirka Kosek e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kosek.cz
