On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Hojtsy Gabor wrote : > > I "old" chm notes, warnings were clearly separated too. I don't think > > it's good when there is a lot of graphical elements. In the document > > there must not be anything that impede reading. > > You have said nothing about the alternate grouping of function properties, > the outside links made truly outside, and marked with an arrow... These > are __not__ only graphics changes. These are conceptual ones... They > don't just differ in colors from the "old" one. > > Do you think that online functions are useless for the common user?
I compared them now a bit more torough (at my best at work): .) Tables: containing enums and descriptions are much easier to read in the new manual. .) Warnings: They were easier to spot in the old manual because the background of the table had a different color. I think this should be also in the now one. The little icon with the red text don't tell much about it being a warning and the text can easily be overseen. Contrary, the notes are now easier to spot because of the surroundin border. .) Examples: It looks nice with border on the left side but the visual accentuation with the light gray background color clearer (at least, to me) .) External links: Perfect; very well done (conceptional and visual) .) See also: very good too .) Purpose, Usage, Availability: IMHO much better to read (except the brightened background image) - Markus
