Hojtsy Gabor writes: > > > > Do anybody use the migration from PHP 2 -> PHP 3??? > > > > Noone uses PHP 2 nowadays I think. The user base was > > > > probably not that much, and every PHP 2 user has either > > > > dropped PHP, or upgraded. I even don't think so, that > > > > a PHP 2 -> PHP 4 section is needed. > > > > > > > > IMHO we now can completely delete migration.xml. > > > > Migration from PHP 3 -> PHP 4 is all contained > > > > in migration4.xml. > > > > > > last time i asked the same question i got a *no* > > > (about 6 month ago?) > > > > > > > Why should we delete it? I don't see any use in deleting that file. Let's > > just leave it there for archeological purposes... > > Why to distribute arhaical documents, sparing space, bandwith
The space used is minimal, and the bandwidth is only used when someone needs the document. Here is my take on it: there may only be a few people who need the information, and their lives will be made easier by having the information. It costs nothing to keep the document. > and other valuable things. Anybody interested in these documents > can find them in the CVS history. This topic will always pop > up in searches, will hold space, although noone uses it. Most > of the time it will annoy people IMHO. OK, it would be harder > for a historian to dig up that file, but are historians that > often use our manual? > > Goba Everybody who finds the fact that this information is available on the website annoying, say 'Aye'. ;) Personally, I vote to keep it. -- Torben Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com +1.604.709.0506
