> > it as SGML, or start discussion about modifying it > > to be XML. There were some reasons to put sgml > > here... I am not using vim, so I don't now what was > > exactly the reason. > > You need it for syntax highlight.
I know that, but there were some discussion about xml and sgml syntax highlighting and as I can remember it turned out, that xml is bit buggy in vim, so, it stayed sgml. This is the same, why the emacs comment is still SGML. But I neither use emacs or vim, vi or vim600, so I don't have any personal problems... Goba
