> > I think this need to be discussed. What coding standard would > > like the phpdoc authors follow, if any. I think we should follow > > one. Either we choose the PEAR coding standard, which needs to > > be extended somewhat for our needs (eg. variable names, > > comment weiting, output sample formatting), or we need to invent > > a new one, but IMHO it is the best for writers and readers to > > have a consistent manual. > > Following a standard seems logical, following the PEAR coding standard > sounds good to me. It's in the manual, makes sense, and is known to many.
It is actually not in the manual anymore. PEAR has its own manual now. The PEAR stuff in the main manual is not generated for output. It is going to be removed. Goba
