Thanks for the suggestions philip. Anyone else have any suggestions, even better, objections? I'd rather not take silence as a yes while someone may object to it.
Best Regards, Kenneth Schwartz E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:04:00 +0000 (GMT) Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good. If the move is made, leave the PHP variables on this page > ($_POST), and have the web server variables list (REMOTE_ADDR) in the > appendix. If feasible, an example call to phpinfo() on php.net might > prove useful too. _maybe_. Consider integrating a few examples of > popular server variables, such as REMOTE_ADDR and HTTP_USER_AGENT, when > explaining $_SERVER. > > I'm leaving for four days now and will most likely miss this thread, good > luck :) > > Regards, > Philip Olson > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Kenneth Schwartz wrote: > > > I've had a few thoughts on the predefined variables section of the > > manual, most triggered by philip's bug report > > [http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=14472]. > > > > IMHO, adding an appendix 'List of Predefined Variables', and removing > > the actual lists from the entry in the manual would unclutter the documentation. > > I think it would make the actual documentation easier to read and > > maintain, i.e. adding the stuff that's in philip's bug report. I don't > > think would create any issues with the users, linking the appendix to > > the doc page, of course. I also think that by creating an appendix of > > the variables, we can remove specific references to Apache in the > > documentation. > > > > It's not that important of an issue (IMHO, again), but I think it would > > help focus the manual entry on the issues stated in philip's bug report > > and keep the list of actual predefined variables separate. > > > > Does anyone else have any comments or suggestions on the issue? I'd > > like to hear what everyone else thinks. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Kenneth Schwartz > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
