> > > > > Modules like iisfunc are moved to pear/PECL. > > > > > Documents for them should be moved to pear. > > > > > > > > > > Or am I wrong? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > It would be nice if the documentation is kept in one place so > > people don't > > > have to remember where the function came from. > > > > Do you mean with "one place" peardoc or phpdoc? > > I meant phpdoc. People are used to www.php.net/funcname. The documentation > should have some standard note that this module is part of PECL and how you > can install it (which is hard to tell right now :).
So this means, all future PECL modules will be documented in phpdoc. IMHO this is definetly not the right way. There are resons, why PECL was separated from php4/ext... The same reasons apply for phpdoc and peardoc (here read peardoc as the repository in cvs). The php.net/funcname thing can be expanded to jump you over to pear.php.net/funcname, if people think they would like to access PECL functions with this technique. Just my 2 cents. Goba
