On Wednesday, 6. February 2002 02:26, James Cox wrote: > As far as the actual license goes, GPL is probably not where we want to be > - it's something i personally shy away from due to it's restrictiveness. > There are many other open source documentation licenses, and we should > probably be looking at them. >
+2 Anybody else?! Where is the problem to change license to OPL or OPL related license? Currently the license and politics of their holder(s) really doesn't improve the Manual (and the spirit of Open Source). Georg
