> > Instant Saxon uses MS JVM, XSLTProc is exe... My testmachine was > > a 850Mhz AMD Duron. > > Saxon with Sun's or IBM's JVM is much more faster than with MS one.
Is there any difference on Windows between IBM and SUN JVMs? I have the latest SUN JSDK, but if IBMs quicker, I'll download and install it. Also what you think about style sheet complecity? We actually only use a small subset of the DocBook DTD. It is possible to increase the speed significantly, with dropping out unsused parts from the style sheet. More precisely with creating a custom modules and a driver with only the templates we use? We use 97 different tags (exact value computed by our tag usage stat program). I don't know how many tags are included in the DocBook DTD, but there must be much-much more. This means many unsuccessful matches for templates while processing... The DocBook XSL docs also mentions, that creating a custom driver can increase speed: | Another approach to customizing the stylesheets is to write your | own driver file. Instead of using <xsl:import href="docbook.xsl"/>, | you copy that file to a new name and rewrite any of the | <xsl:include/> instructions to assemble a custom collection of | stylesheet modules. One reason to do this is to speed up processing | by reducing the size of the stylesheet. If you are using a customized | DocBook DTD that omits many elements you never use, you might be | able to omit those modules of the stylesheet. How much speed increase we can gain with this method? Is it significant? Goba
