le 28/11/02 22:49, Gabor Hojtsy ā [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : >> The peardoc format will be phased out for peardoc2 which >> uses several files, that is one per function, one for constants, etc. >> >> It makes sense to document PECL in the pear manual since PECL is in pear. > > Well, actually this what I wanted to hear :) I also think that moving > PECL module's manuals to PECL is the way to go. Those extensions are > mostly rarely used... We can make up a list in the manual about moved > extensions and some text about why this happened / happens...
IMO, a lot of extensions that are currently documented in the PHP manual could be moved to PECL and PEAR doc. This would make the PHP manual lighter to download, display, handle. The PHP manual could keep documentation about the core extensions (still to be defined). Furthermore, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have a pecldoc on its own as both pear and pecl are going to grow beyond what we can imagine :) In which case, peardoc is going to be huge to manage, search, consult. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
