--- Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would tend to consider the notes to the manual > as > > documentation. Because the intent is to allow > people > > to expand/clarify on a documentation item > (function, > > etc.). > > > > If the comment is good and the function has a very > > sparse documentation, it usually gets added into > the > > body of the manual (and the note removed). > > Bottomline, I would consider the notes to the > manual > > as having the same license as the manual itself, > i.e. > > GPL now (might change to OPL or similar IIRC). > > > > Any other opinions? > > Well, yes, as the notes are incorporated from time > to > time to the manual, the best would probably be if > they > would reside under the same license as the manual. > It > would be nice to write up some text on the > about-notes > page regarding the license ;)
I just modified en/appendices/about.xml to include a paragraph explaining the status of the notes as part of the manual, and thus having the same license. Check for the specific language in the recent commit, and modify as needed if something is not clear or does not sound good. Cheers. > > Goba ===== --- Jesus M. Castagnetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
