On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Davey wrote:

> Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> >> As you can see, one is using <type>callback</type> the other 
> >> <type>mixed</type>, the reasons being obvious - a callback is just a 
> >> string or an array... so the question here is, do we respect the 
> >> callback type as its own which consists of 'mixed' data, or do we use 
> >> mixed? I personally feel that callback is more descriptive. as I am 
> >> going through all callback functions anyways, I will change them all 
> >> to have the same, whatever is decided. I'm not entirely bothered which 
> >> is chosen, so long as one is, and its stuck too.
> > 
> > 
> > I am fine with the callback type, and the "handler" name to use for 
> > callback paramater names.
> > 
> > Goba
> > 
> 
> It seems that "callback" and "handler" are well recieved, would you like 
> for me to go through and change all functions which use callbacks to 
> have this? I am going to go through all the functions anyways as I 
> mentioned in my original e-mail, doing this is little extra work I don't 
> mind doing. Just tell me when you gurus have reached a final decision on 
> what should be used and I'll get right on it :)

Go for it :)

Regards,
Philip


-- 
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to