Hi John,

I've written all the Tidy docs so far. I think that removing my work isn't
correct...
I've tested all examples, exchanged mails with Tidylib guys, opened bugs for
Tidylib (1 is still open) for missing features or functions that weren't
really working.....
I've even had to read the tidylib sources to check some important things to
document....

What is so wrong? I haven't changed the OO functions (yet) to the new
studlyCaps, because I'll wait until the dicussion in internalls is over
(will it over some day?? :)


Nuno


> Just to let everyone know..
>
> The tidy documentation in CVS currently is not correct for Tidy 2.0, the
> version of tidy which is bundled with PHP5. Plus, the documentation that
> does exist is not completely correct for Tidy 1.0.
>
> Personally, I rather not have Tidy 1.0 documented in the PHP Manual as
> it is the PECL version of the extension for PHP 4.3.x only. Can we
> please have that documentation removed? Instead, I'll be putting
> together a documentation for Tidy 1.0 on the coggeshall.org web site and
> we can provide a link in the manual
>
>
> -- 
> -=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-
> John Coggeshall                   http://www.coggeshall.org/
> The PHP Developer's Handbook    http://www.php-handbook.com/
> -=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-

Reply via email to