> Can we come up with a more precise naming scheme for ID attributes then? > > Something like function.ext-name.func-name; we can still retain (and > prefer) the current scheme, but use this one when we have a collision. > > This should be reasonably simple to hack into livedocs. > > --Wez.
I was hacking livedocs right now to find the ID of a function throught the DB, instead of nasty search&replaces. This patch works pretty well now. We can implement this by querying the DB and if it returns more than one result, pick the one that is related with that extension. althought how will you choose the correct if the link is done outside of the extension? But I think that this will take too much time to execute. IMHO, we should keep the current system and just use <link>s. Nuno
