ID: 30091 User updated by: jmchen at zinwell dot com dot tw Reported By: jmchen at zinwell dot com dot tw Status: Bogus Bug Type: Documentation problem Operating System: windows PHP Version: 4.3.7 New Comment:
Sorry about that and thanks for your advice. Even though I know the "RULE", I still make mistakes. I had looked hardly for the same problem with lots of times, but I just misssssed that one that had different title report. It seemed "We can't rely on the title search for the same bug. You should have to check reports one by one." I will be carefully for the next time.:-) Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-09-16 09:54:32] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not submit the same bug more than once. An existing bug report already describes this very problem. Even if you feel that your issue is somewhat different, the resolution is likely to be the same. Thank you for your interest in PHP. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-09-15 12:58:11] jmchen at zinwell dot com dot tw I saw the same report at #28459. Please ignore this. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-09-15 10:41:34] jmchen at zinwell dot com dot tw Description: ------------ I have found a bug on page language.oop.constructor.html [chm date: 2003-09-06]... At last example in PHP 4, the class B would have no constructor function of its own and the constructor of the base class would have been called, printing 'I am a regular function named B in class A.<br>I am not a constructor in A.<br>', but not printing 'I am the constructor of A.<br>'. Reproduce code: --------------- As manual's example. Actual result: -------------- I am confused with the latest manual right now. I don't know which one is correct. May I miss something? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=30091&edit=1
