>>Comments? > > Good idea! Unfortunately I don't have enough time and enthusiasm to > implement this currently, so other volunteers are welcome :-). > > In my eyes, extension categorization is not so visible in the appendix > so the described problems are not so big as if it would be directly in > the contents but it's still worth implementing it this way IMHO. > > Jakub Vrana
Implemented part of the solution: moved out language specific content from extensions.xml to extensions.ent, so that it does not need to be translated anymore. Next step is to autogenerate the file, with some flags like: <!-- Flags: purpose.basic.text, state.experimental, membership.pecl --> Or maybe with searching for &warn.experimental;, we can automate experimental tagging, and &pecl.moved; is one that can be used to detect PECL extensions... Goba
