>>> +dnl {{{ disable Internals documentation
>>> +
>>> +AC_MSG_CHECKING(for internals docs inclusion)
>>> +
>>> +AC_ARG_WITH(internals,
>>> +[ --without-internals disable internals docs inclusion],
>>> +[
>>> + INTERNALS_INCL_BEGIN="<!--"
>>> + INTERNALS_INCL_END="-->"
>>> + AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
>>> +],[
>>> + INTERNALS_INCL_BEGIN=""
>>> + INTERNALS_INCL_END=""
>>> + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes (default)])
>>> +])
>>
>> You mean the other way round! :) Either name the parameter
>> --with-internals, or swap the order of the variable settings.
>> --without-internals=yes should mean the addition of the comments, and
>> should not be the default.
>>
>> Goba
>
> I've tested and it worked..
> './configure' does include the internals docs
> while './configure --without-internals' doesn't
>
> Nuno
But the code still does not make sense... It might work, but it prints
(yes in your first example, and no in your second, which is
contradictory to the intended result :) At least I guess.
Goba
