> - Doing failed builds are enough burden for the building machine. That is the type of answer I hoped for, though in a positive way. But at least it's statement regarding the (lacking) possibility. OK, that's sad
> - Doing a new build needs to rebuild the whole manual, regardless > of the number of pages changed (10 is a drop in the ocean if > you consider the thousands of pages in the manual) Well, I thought there was some possibility like the $ xsltproc --stringparam rootid "<ID>" xsl/html.xsl manual.xml mentioned in the dochowto. > > - Last but not least this works this way, because unfortunately > those who complain about this system rarely end up > improving/fixing/submitting bugs and patches against > livedocs, so that we can get out of this situation. I see, so it all boils down on getting livedocs to production quality, so the whole process of supplying the manual can be redone, do I get this right? OK, so I thank you very much for your answers. Though they were not very satisfying for my "problems", but I am now quite enlightened compared to before :) Bye, Florian
