Hello, Gabor!

As remind Jakub Vrana, I can use C:\Progra~1. So it is not so inconvinient as I think before and I am not insisting the patch should be commited :-)
But as I will use whitespaces in paths and periodically build manual, I can support this feature and I am not afraid to change more than one file.

Regards,
Sveta.

Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Well, Sveta, I am not strictly against supporting spaces in the PHP
installation path, but this is just the beginning of some big changes,
if you really would like to support spaces in paths. I think you are
going to face several problems in the phpdoc build system, if you use
path values with spaces.

That said, unless it breaks something, I don't think it would be a
problem applying your patch (I am unable to try it now), but I would
like to warn you that it will probably not solve the space in path
values issue alltogether.

Goba

sveta wrote:
  
Hello Gabor!

In Windows default place for programs is "C:\Program
Files\Program_name". "C:\Program Files" contains whitespace. Installing
of all programs in different places is inconvinient. For example people
don't raise an objection when UNIX-based operation systems require
install programs in /usr/local/bin.  I understand why you don't want to
change this behavior, but I've only found same path in Makefile.in So if
you agree to support "whitespaces in paths" I can change build scripts
for it :-)

Regards,
Sveta.

Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

    
Hi Sveta,

Sveta Smirnova wrote:
 

      
Hello!

When I tried to build copy of manual using configure option
--with-php="path with whitespaces", I got error.

In attached diff patch, allows use whitespaces in paths.

Regards,
Sveta.
   

        
What does a space char do in a path? :) Seriosly, this path is used
elsewhere in the build system, and I think it is not "as easy" as
"fixing" only configure.in. You'd better follow our instructions and not
put PHP into a path with spaces in it IMHO.

Gabor

 

      


  

Reply via email to