On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:23 -0500, Sean Coates wrote: > > The final decision will be of course up to you guys, but I would hope > > that the patch be applied. The patch would make the page a little too > > big, like you say, but I would vote for the consistency in page format > > (I don't see constants given as ranges elsewhere), than a slight page > > size increase in just one extension. > > I agree with Nuno, here. Readability over hard consistency rules, IMO. > I think your best bet is to craw the XML as you do now, and apply local > overlays on your end.
Yeah. Sounds like that will be my best bet. Luckily ncurses extension is the only place where constant ranges are given, so I can easily make a special case for it. Thanks guys, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, Software Engineer SlickEdit Inc. [ http://www.slickedit.com/ ]
