On 27 April 2006 07:11, bugs at jlevine dot oiiiio dot net wrote:

> I would also recommend rephrasing the fragment of the preceding line
> from: "it was unknown that the object will be named $cart or
> $another_cart later." to
> "it was unknown whether the object would be named $cart,
> $another_cart, or something else later."

Well, if we're being really, really picky (which, apparently, we are ;), this 
should probably also be "it would have been unknown...".

But, personally, I'm thankful enough that there are so many non-native English 
speakers prepared to keep the manual in such good shape that I tend to let 
small imprecisions like this go, so long as the intent is obvious and 
unambiguous.

(Mind you, I could put together a small list of words and constructs that 
non-native-speakers seem to get consistently wrong, if I could be bothered to 
be bothered about it. ;)

Cheers!

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Ford,  Electronic Information Services Adviser,
Learning Support Services, Learning & Information Services,
JG125, James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Headingley Campus, LEEDS,  LS6 3QS,  United Kingdom
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730      Fax:  +44 113 283 3211 


To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to 
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm

Reply via email to