No way!!!!
We cannot start breaking translators' work. Anyway, what's the problem with
contractions? When I studied English (British) I learned that contractions
weren't so formal, but they aren't wrong per se.
Any English native speaker correct me if I'm wrong.
But thanks for your offer, Richard.
Nuno
P.S.: offtopic: Richard: I cannot fix your bug with xchm manual because my
laptop got broken, unless you can send me the index.html file before
processing by the scripts, so that I can try to tune the regex.
----- Original Message -----
OOI, should all contractions be removed?
I did a quick check on the entire phpdoc/en directory.
Looking for aren't, can't, shouldn't, won't and wouldn't.
Found 167 occurrences.
Increased that to the entire phpdoc directory and got 362.
I can easily correct the phpdoc/en ones and provide a patch.
Should I?
And what about the other files
Regards,
Richard Quadling.
Horst Schirmeier wrote:
- and what the returned value may look like. Statements that aren't
listed - will return &false;
+ and what the returned value may look like. Statements that are not
listed + will return &false;.
</para>
</refsect1>
