# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-06 00:36:25 +0100: > On 2/5/07, Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-05 23:11:46 -0000: > >> bjori Mon Feb 5 23:11:46 2007 UTC > >> > >> Modified files: > >> /phpdoc/phpbook/phpbook-xsl common.xsl > >> Log: > >> constructors can be void, too > > > >I thought the type of a constructor is always the name of the containing > >class. In what sense can be a constructor void? > > Hi Roman > > Sorry for the confusing commit message, > the constructor doesn't need any arguments - just as any other > ordinary method/function. > > This commit fixes > http://php.net/function.dom-domimplementation-construct for instance.
Aha! Hmm... How about avoiding the overload on "void" by using "nullary" for functions taking no parameters? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
