> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Magnusson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:54 AM
> To: Logan Buesching
> Cc: phpdoc@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/posix/functions
posix-
> ctermid.xml posix-get-last-error.xml posix-getcwd.xml
posix-getegid.xml posix-
> geteuid.xml posix-getgid.xml posix-getgrgid.xml posix-getgrnam.xml
posix-
> getgroups.xml posix-getlogin.xml posi
> 
> On 5/4/07, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did a cursory review of the commit and it's ok, except the
following
> > (repeated several times):
> >
> > +    <programlisting role="php">
> > +<![CDATA[
> > +#!/usr/local/bin/php
> > +<?php
> >
> > I don't really like the shebang there, nor I do think it should go
into the
> > examples. Please remove that.


I can go through these and remove them sometime this weekend.  I thought
I had reasoning for having those, but I can't recall it now. 

> 
> The order of the <refsects /> are also weird at times.
> For instance in posix_ctermid() the example is before the return
> value, in posix_getegid() the notes are before the return value...
> 


I tried to be as consistent as possible, but is there a preferred order
for them?

> In posix-getcwd.xml: "This function can fail on can fail on"
> 

Must be a copy-paste error :(

> BTW: The docs are already online: http://php.net/ref.posix \o/


If there are any more comments please let me know as it will help me
make better docs in the future.  Part of the reason why I started with
the POSIX functions was that I believe they are quite less used than
some other functions, and that they would be good practice grounds for
when I want to work on other items.

-Logan

Reply via email to