On Dec 3, 2007 9:35 PM, Edward Z. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > IMO it shouldn't, not. They should look at the "class view" if they > > want further details on how its defined, the 'detailed property' > > listing should only contain the description of it. > > Ok, that sounds fine. It might, then, be useful to have a link back from > the detailed property to the class view. It just seems a little > counterintuitive to me that the in-depth description is not complete, > i.e. not everything is centralized.
The "detailed property" is a badly misused classification of the section. It should be "Property Descriptions" (in the spirit of the <para> in <refsect1 role="description"> for functions) :) -Hannes
