On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:48, Gwynne Raskind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In order to progress further on the SVN conversion, I need to know how many > projects need separate repositories from php-src, and the purpose and active > status of *all* the current CVS modules. The complete list of current CVS > modules is appended to the end of this e-mail. Anyone with status > information on them, please step forward and let me know. And anyone who > knows which projects need to be their own SVN repository, instead of merged > with that of php-src, also please let me know.
[snip-long-list-of-modules] [svn-migration@: mail 2outof3] PhD would like its own repository. As I understand it, after discussing this (a lot) with Gwynne there is only gain (almost 0 disadvantages) to do that. PhD doesn't exactly fit anywhere. It is an php.net application that renders Docbook files (*fast*). Currently it is being used by the php documentations and Christian Weiske is currently working on using it for the pear docs. In the future the hope is to get the php-gtk docs using the system to, and then world domination in the docbook "market". -Hannes
