On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 15:34, Moacir de Oliveira<[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/28 Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> >> >> Do you have any plans of supporting dbhtml filename directly in the >> indexer itself? >> > > I didn't understand your question, the indexer already supports the dbhtml > filename.
Haha. No wonder you didn't understand the question :) I got confused by the all the new filesnames, it looked like it was only one output format that supported it, not the actual indexer :) -Hannes
