On 31 March 2010 10:27, Daniel Egeberg <degeb...@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:16, Jordi Boggiano <j.boggi...@seld.be> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote: >>> (d) Write "Future PHP Release" or similar until we know (seems okay) >>> >>> I lean towards (d) for most cases. Thoughts? >> >> I'd also prefer D since it is the easiest to search & replace once >> decisions are made. I think however that instead of Future PHP >> Release, which sounds really vague and timeless, I'd suggest deciding >> upon a name that everyone uses to talk about the next php, the obvious >> PHP.Next seems to be almost a standard now, we could make it more >> phpey with \PHP::Next or something, but I don't mind too much either >> way. This is still a bit vague and timeless, but it sounds cooler and >> it sounds like it's coming next, not "once upon a time in the future". > > Why not just call it trunk? > > -- > Daniel Egeberg >
That's what elephpant's have! -- ----- Richard Quadling "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html EE4Free : http://www.experts-exchange.com/becomeAnExpert.jsp Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 ZOPA : http://uk.zopa.com/member/RQuadling
