On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote: > Hi Hannes: > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >> >> I didn't even realize that built-in classes had private >> properties/methods. Seems utterly useless to tell the end-user that. > > You're right. They shouldn't be in the docs in the first place, even in > their original classes. Someone should hunt them down and remove them.
Thankfully these only existed in a few places. They have all been removed, and the docgen script now ignores them. Regards, Philip
