On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:39, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5 May 2010 01:51, Daniel Convissor <dani...@php.net> wrote: >>> danielc Wed, 05 May 2010 00:51:18 +0000 >>> >>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=299003 >>> >>> Log: >>> Use function instead of methodname in seealso to get () in output. >> >> Please use the most appropriate tag for its content, in this case >> methodname. If you want method names to have parentheses suffixed, >> raise a bug. > > That is something that has annoyed me for a while, and I cannot > remember the reasoning for not having () for <methodname>. > > Does anyone remember? > Did people maybe do <methodname>foo:bar()</methodname> "in the old days"? > > I vote for "fixing it" :]
++ This has been bugging me for a while as well. -- Daniel Egeberg
