2010/5/19 Yannick Torrès <yannick.tor...@gmail.com> > Hi all, > > Here is some important news about this development. > > I'm about to commit the new version of the editor who include all features > discuss in this thread. > > After I commit this, *all patch will be lost !* Actually, there is one in > EN, 4 in RU. > Please, clean up this before my futur commit. > > I will wait for one or 2 days before commit. This can let me some time to > polish the new UI, and you, work on patch. > > There is no "revolution" on the UI, except that pending commit and pending > patch are go away, replace by "work in progress" and "patches for review" > modules. > But a lot of work in background have been done to achieve this. > > So, remember : work on current patch to not lose this work. > After commit, I will be able to get all "pending commit" work and put it > into new "work in progress" module. > > Best, > Yannick > > > > > 2010/4/24 Christopher Jones <christopher.jo...@oracle.com> > >> >> Christopher Jones wrote: >> > >> > >> > Yannick Torrčs wrote: >> > > Is it really necessary to allow valid user to save as a patch ? >> > > Perhaps we can just allow "save as a patch" for anonymous user. >> > >> > Some unification & simplification of processes and terminology would >> > really help. The difference between "Pending for commit" and "Pending >> > patches" isn't obvious. >> > >> > I think the process should only distinguish between "work in progress" >> > and "complete work". In the UI I'd label them "Incomplete patches" >> > and "Completed patches". Anonymous users should be allowed (somehow) >> > to "Save" files so they are in the "Incomplete patches" queue, just >> > the same as an authenticated user. There should one button (Save), >> > not two (Save & Save as patch). >> > >> > There should be a way to change the patch state from Incomplete to >> > Complete when the author is happy with the content alteration. In the >> > "Completed patches" queue it should be straightforward for >> > authenticated users to commit. Completed patches by Anonymous users >> > could also go into the "Completed patches" queue, or to a separate >> > "Contributed Patches" queue. >> > >> > Chris >> > >> >> This mail expands on what I wrote above, and summarizes for discussion >> a long IRC chat with Yannick. >> >> Chris >> >> ----------------------- >> >> The basic process could be reduced for all users to: Save files -> >> Create Patch -> Commit. Optionally, we could also allow Save files -> >> Commit. >> >> Each file editor only has one "Save" button, and the "Save as Patch" >> button is removed. >> >> "Save" would place the file in a "Save Work" section, grouped by user. >> This section simply means "Here is a file I've edited". It doesn't >> imply work on the file is finished. >> >> If user #2 tries to save a file that user #1 has already saved, then >> user #2 is shown an error and must contact user #1 about committing & >> releasing the file. >> >> After a few users have saved files the "Saved Work" section could >> look like: >> >> Saved Work >> sixd >> oci8_a.xml >> oci8_b.xml >> date.xml >> yannick >> spl1.xml >> spl2.xml >> Anonymous >> array.xml >> session.xml >> mysql.xml >> >> Each saved file shows a checkbox to only the user who saved it. There >> is a "Submit as Patch for Review" option that operates on all checked >> files. >> >> A possibile variation is for authenticated users to have an extra >> option to commit the checked files directly. An Anonymous user would >> only ever have the "Submit as Patch for Review" option. >> >> All patches for all anonymous users either appear in the same >> "Anonymous" sub-section, or have their own subsection like "Anonymous >> #1". >> >> To prevent DOS issues, it might be best to rollback anonymous saved >> work when the user logs out or the session has been inactive for some >> hours. Most users making non-trivial changes will have accounts. >> >> Submitting a patch moves files from the "Saved Work" to a "Patches >> for Review" section. >> >> After sixd had checked both oci8 files and submitted them, the UI >> would look like: >> >> Saved Work >> sixd >> date.xml >> yannick >> spl1.xml >> spl2.xml >> Anonymous >> array.xml >> session.xml >> mysql.xml >> >> Patches for Review >> sixd >> Patch 1 >> oci8_a.xml >> oci8_b.xml >> >> If sixd later submits date.xml and an anonymous user submits >> array.xml, the UI would look like: >> >> Saved Work >> yannick >> spl1.xml >> spl2.xml >> Anonymous >> session.xml >> mysql.xml >> >> Patches for Review >> sixd >> Patch 1 >> oci8_a.xml >> oci8_b.xml >> Patch 2 >> date.xml >> anonymous >> Patch 1 >> array.xml >> >> Each of the "Patch X" lines would allow committing, deleting or >> re-editing (moving back to the "Saved Work" section so further changes >> can be made) of the patch. >> >> Users can commit their own patches, and possibly those of others. >> >> An overall Administration role could be introduced with extra access >> as needed. >> >> >> -- >> Email: christopher.jo...@oracle.com >> Tel: +1 650 506 8630 >> Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ >> Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/ugpomhome >> > > Hi all,
I just commit the new version of the editor. You can view the commit log message here : http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=299715 Best, Yannick
