On 13 July 2010 19:00, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:30, Richard Quadling <rquadl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Are there any plans to release the next version of PhD? >> > > As soon as Moacir or I have the time to do so. > Unless someone else think they can do it? > > >> If a new version is released, do the mirrors automatically get updated? >> > > No. mirrors dont use PhD and I dont actually remember if the rsync box > does 'pear upgrade' before generating the builds.. I dont believe so > though. > > -Hannes >
So, new features and corresponding XML is an issue then? I've built support for the <void /> return type, rather than as only a parameter, and does away with <type>void</type> This matches the processing expectations "The Void element produces generated text that indicates the function has no arguments (or returns nothing). The exact generated text may vary. One common result is void." Actually <type>void</type> is fine. <type> is part of the sequence for methodsynopsis, but I like <void />.
