On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Chris Wright <chr...@aquacool.ltd.uk> wrote:
> > > Didn't we archive the PHP4 explicit functionality like we did for PHP3
> > > (http://php.net/manual/php3.php) somewhere?

> > > Stuff like the old DOM extension and overload() function and whatever..
> > Not as far as I can tell. The PHP4 OOP docs where moved to their own 
> > appendix
> > (http://www.php.net/manual/en/oop4.php) but no other elements of 
> > PHP4-specific
> > docs appear to have been given the same treatment. I'm all for doing this at
> > the earliest opportunity.

> +1

Great. Looking at the way the PHP/FI and PHP3 docs were handled, they were
converted to (or always were?) static HTML and aren't maintained in docbook, is
this what we would want to do with the PHP4 docs as well or should we keep them 
as
an appendix in the main docs? It doesn't seem like there's much point in keeping
then in a readily modifiable state and rebuilding them every time, since they
won't ever change.

Depressingly there are still PHP4 installations out there in the wild, and while
it's unlikely that anyone will need to do a migration these days, there are 
cases
where developers may need to access the docs for userland PHP4 (the OOP model in
particular). I do think it would be worth hanging on to as much of the content 
as
reasonably possible, it appears quite a bit of PHP3 documentation was dropped
when it was archived (or maybe not, I don't know, it was before my time).

> > The docs for overload() appear to have disappeared up their own branch of 
> > the
> > space-time continuum, I was looking for them a few months back when I had 
> > the
> > displeasure of modifying some legacy PHP4 code. If someone could dig them 
> > out
> > I would actually personally appreciate it.

> http://www.php.net/manual/fa/book.overload.php
> Outdated translations ftw!

Fantastic, thanks!

> > While we're on the subject of PHP4, do we really need both of the below?

> > http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.migration5.php
> > http://www.php.net/manual/en/migration5.php

> > I'd be tempted to say that they are no longer necessary in the main manual 
> > at
> > all, but at the very least surely the two can be distilled to a single
> > section?


> Not even worth merging. Just kill the faq, and archive the migration part?

I'm fine with that, no point in putting a load of work into something very few
people will ever read.



Reply via email to