It seems most of the developers haven't tested PGW under 4.4.0, so
there appears to be no documented advantage to using it. The point of
my message was that the changes between 4.4.0 and previous versions
are relatively small, so it is reasonable to anticipate that there
will be few or no problems.
Look, i havent tested it for 4.4.x but up until 4.3.9 (RHEL4/CentOS
latest) it worx very very well.
I wouldnt be surprised if a php minor version upgrade broke it since php
is known for doing that all too often (breaking the language on minor
releases), but i would expect it to run without too much troubles either.
Take it out for a spin, let us know.
At 2005 08 08 20:18, You wrote:
Alan Langford
Thank you for your advises.
I have some questions in your doubt.
> The caveat is that I use a relatively small number of PGW features
under a
> low load.
* "number" means a version?
* "under a low load" means?
> It should also be noted that 4.4.0 fixes a big problem with
references that
> had plagued me in the past. The update is in fact quite minor; the
only
> reason why it wasn't released as 4.3.12 is that they had to change
the API
> to implement the fix.
* Had better I use PHP4.4.0 if I use PGW?
Please tell me the above.
Regards,
samotty
Alan Langford wrote:
> I have been running PGW v0.9.16.005 and several other applications
under
> PHP 4.4.0 without any problem whatsoever, since about two days
after it's
> release (shameless plug for Gentoo's Portage update system here).
>
> The caveat is that I use a relatively small number of PGW features
under a
> low load.
>
> It should also be noted that 4.4.0 fixes a big problem with
references that
> had plagued me in the past. The update is in fact quite minor; the
only
> reason why it wasn't released as 4.3.12 is that they had to change
the API
> to implement the fix.
>
> At 2005 08 08 04:09, Guillaume Courtois wrote:
> >I think Sigurd was not talking about your problem, but was asking
the question
> >for himself.
> >
> >I can't tell, I have still 4.3.10.
> >
> >"$B:4K\C#5A(B" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) $BqD(Brivait:
> > >
> > > Thank you for your poining out.
> > >
> > > No, PHP4.4.0 is installed at first.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > samotty
> > >
> > > Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > > > Is it safe to upgrade to PHP 4.4.0 (from 4.3.11)?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Sigurd
> > > >
> > >
> > > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > >
> > > $B3t<02q<R(B $B#T#Y#K>pJs%5!<%S%9(B
> > > $B:4K!!C#5A(B
> > > TEL 0572-25-7176
> > > FAX 0572-22-8190
> > > Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> > > Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> >Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
> >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
>
_______________________________________________
Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
_______________________________________________
Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
_______________________________________________
Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
