On 10/4/05, Dave Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 11:36 -0500, Chris Weiss wrote: > > what about a new "app" for storing unsupported api classes? This > > could even be a HEAD only app and have the stable parts of it moved to > > main API at release time. Afterall, these are 3rd party and > > unsupported apps we are talking about. > > This still creates clutter and is still a pain for cvs updates and > maintainability.
sure, but so does having 3rd party apps > > > > > for this, i would support the CreateObject function to be slightly > > mod'd to check for this api when it doens't find a requested class. > > The error handling should already be there so it's just another if(). > > > > > > IMHO this will create more work than what I have proposed. yeah, but will be less invasive and more flexible and not require a new release just to support more 3rd party apps. > > If people feel strongly enough about it, I am happy to drop the proposal > of patching 16 with Sigurd's patch, and simply including it in > phpgwapi/doc What do people think of that idea? > > Cheers > > Dave _______________________________________________ Phpgroupware-developers mailing list Phpgroupware-developers@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
