On 7/4/07, Dave Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope that in the coming weeks we can release a new 0.9.16.01x GPLv3 version of phpGroupWare.
What's the drawback of leaving it as "v2 or later"? seems there are benefits to this due to the v2 and v3 incompatibility. I see drawbacks to full-on changing to v3 as well, such as the 3rd party libs we use that are not yet v3 and not "v2 or later" (are there even of these?), we will have to stop using them. I say we leave Stable alone and evaluate the "need" in HEAD. If the libs allow v3 then we can change head. However, I don't think v3 has any effect on us at all. tivoization isn't really and issue, and being PHP, neither is DRM, and given the lack of corporate interest the rest of the issues are moot as well. The only benefit I see to us might be the new Apache license compatibility, which could open up some 3rd party stuff for integration. _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
