Dave Hall a écrit : > On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 10:34 +0100, Maât wrote: > >> Dave Hall a écrit : >> >>> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 22:59 +0200, Maât wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Dave Hall a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Watchers >>>>> >>>>> This checkin was too large and so was rejected by the GNU mail server >>>>> see >>>>> >>>>> http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc?view=rev&root=phpgroupware&revision=18606 >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> It seems that the phpgw_app_sessions table was removed during 18606 : >>>> http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/phpgwapi/setup/tables_current.inc.php?root=phpgroupware&r1=18466&r2=18606&pathrev=18606 >>>> >>>> i guess we are now using php sessions but the current code still tries >>>> to use phpgw_app_sessions >>>> >>>> >>> Yep that's right. The app_session table is no more. Any code which >>> bypasses the session class and uses that table directly is broken - as >>> it was by design before this change was made. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >> ok thanks. >> >> can i find somewhere a model of call using the session class ? >> >> that would help me avoid to "re-invent the whell" >> > > The session class should be working fine. It uses the new cache class > for caching data. > > Cheers > > Dave >
i did not make myself very clear sorry new trial : *where* in the code may i find a nice example of call to session class that would help me to replace the direct calls to old phpgw_app_session table ? (or if there is nothing available at the moment do need to investigate alone ?) regards, Maât _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
