That makes sense.  Lets move it out of head and into a branch.

On 11 May, 15:25, "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/07, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Simon, yes I did.  I had been assured that this would be ok because
> > the 'development in a branch' approach is really only necessary for
> > native extension code (because pecl4win always pulls this from HEAD).
> > Let me know if you think the binding should go elsewhere.
> > On 11 May, 14:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Nice Graham. Don't have any feedback yet but a quick question. Did you
> > > mean to check it into HEAD rather than the branch?
> > > Simon
> > I guess it's OK as we are just about to put another release. You are right
> about the pecl4win thing so any php changes in HEAD will not affect the dlls
> that people download. However as we have this rather strange situation where
> we release from HEAD and develop in a branch rather than the other way round
> HEAD is our live representation of the last release so if we have to make a
> quick fix that's where we would do it. I guess we could make a branch from
> the release lable if we really had to but that's starting to get
> complicated. If we start developing code in two places it just gets really
> complicated IMHO.
> Simon

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to