On 02-06-2010 at 11:10:43 Robert Goldsmith <rgoldsm...@names.co.uk> wrote:

Why would someone choose to replace PHPTAL's autoload with something else? (I'm not implying it's perfect or such, just wondering what problem would such option solve).

If people already have autoloader code and wish to use only one autoloader in their application or if they find the autoloader they are already using conflicts with the phptal one then it would be good to allow them to disable the phptal autoloader.

require_once "PHPTAL.php";
// if needed: spl_autoload_register('__autoload');

Would that be OK?

regards, Kornel

PHPTAL mailing list

Reply via email to