> I completely agree with this! :( > HTML mails really s.... Well sorry I completely don't. :o) I'm sorry if this causes inconvenience, but that is what multipart/alternative was created for, and that's what I send and that's what I will continue to send. I know much of the CS world uses Pine and other CMD line mailers, but the additional formatting that html allows makes it my preferred choice of mail format.
May I recommend IMAP to you all (as an alternative to POP or telnet), then you can access your mailbox using any gui on any OS using a wide variety of mail clients (including pine/elm/etc). Failing that just switch to a mailer that supports multipart/alternative MIME body parts, then you'll never see the "ugly" html body parts. Or perhaps you could write youself a mail script that filters out "Content-Type: text/html;" MIME body parts when there is a text/plain available? I have no idea what the membership is on this list, 50 ish I'd guess, possibly as many as 100, but unless a substantial proportion "demand" text only, then I will not be switching off HTML just to cater for what I believe to be the minority. Sorry. Nigel =========================== For the most recent version of phpxml, V1.N.X, and an archive of this list visit: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/phpxmldb -- This message has been sent through the <phpXML/> user discussion list. To unsubscribe, please visit https:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ _______________________________________________ Phpxmldb-phpxml-arc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpxmldb-phpxml-arc
