Hi Tomas, > maybe it could become part of lib/xml.l? I would use it as it looks > more convenient than building list for 'xml' function in some cases.
I'm not sure. It might be convenient, but it makes 'xml' asymmetrical. Are you thinking of a separate '<xml>' function? It should be tried in practical use. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]