Hi Tomas,

> maybe it could become part of lib/xml.l?  I would use it as it looks
> more convenient than building list for 'xml' function in some cases.

I'm not sure. It might be convenient, but it makes 'xml' asymmetrical.
Are you thinking of a separate '<xml>' function? It should be tried in
practical use.

Cheers,
- Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to