Alex, I thought you mentioned once that you had found a bug after the contest that the fix would have made picolisp *much* faster than what was then measured.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > > ..are there any more resources discussing this, e.g. forums for > > participants and/or your solution (code with explanation...)? > > Sorry, I don't know. I didn't even know the second and third ones on > your list. > > Cheers, > - Alex > > Tomas, I am not clear about the results that you just posted, are you saying that picolisp today would give 63000 opm? That would be in the ballpark of being *much* faster. -- Cheers! - Rand ------=_Part_37313_11372820.1228406631800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Alex, I thought you mentioned once that you had found a bug after the contest<br>that the fix would have made picolisp *much* faster than what was then measured.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Alexander Burger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Tomas,<br> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> > ..are there any more resources discussing this, e.g. forums for<br> > participants and/or your solution (code with explanation...)?<br> <br> </div>Sorry, I don't know. I didn't even know the second and third ones on<br> your list.<br> <br> Cheers,<br> - Alex<br> <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>Tomas, I am not clear about the results that you just posted,<br>are you saying that picolisp today would give 63000 opm? That would<br>be in the ballpark of being *much* faster.<br clear="all"> <br>-- <br>Cheers!<br>- Rand<br><br> ------=_Part_37313_11372820.1228406631800-- -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
