On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0300, TC wrote: > I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
Ah, sorry, then we have a misunderstanding. As far as I remember, we agreed that I will not push ongoing development code (i.e. the 64-bit stuff), and we wait until 3.0 is finished. I suggest that we wait till the beginning of October, then set up a fresh initial repository (I considered the current one as experimental) which will contain the whole system including the 32-bit stuff (but not the 64-bit stuff, as this is still too much in a flow). I'll continue with providing the base system releases, if possible in three-month-cycles as before, and everybody is free to add and maintain extensions in the hg repo. Even better I would find if I would not have to care about the hg repo at all, and some of our specialists (tc.rucho, hsarvell, ..) could take the responsibility of adding/updating base system changes to the repo. This means that only the responsibility of the base system stays with me, and I would have to implement custom change requests manually as before, but this would save me a lot of time in total. The responsibility for custom extensions and modifications in the repo stays with the individual who initiated them. Is this ok? Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
