Hi Henrik and TC,
>> I just realized that there is an ambiguity here since I can't seem to
>> accomplish a pair looking like this:
>>
>> ("key" . (1 2 3)), no matter how I try I get: ("key" (1 2 3)), if the
>
> Heh, I think the problem is quite obvious when looking to the list as what
> it really is: a chain of cons.
>
> ("key" (1 2 3)) -> ("key" . ((1 . (2 . (3 . NIL)))))
>
> that's equivalent to:
>
> ("key" . (1 2 3)) => ("key" (1 2 3))
well, picolisp says that:
: '("key" . (1 2 3))
-> ("key" 1 2 3)
:
>>> In any case I can't think of a situation where I would have a
>>> string with quotes in it.
That seems to me like a serious flaw:-(
Regards,
Tomas
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
