On March 7, 2012 at 8:30 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> > How many percent (very roughly) of the PicoLisp functions are depending on
> > this 'native' function? If it's less than say 10%, one could probably find
> > an alternative solution for these "natives", or just ignore them. I'm only
> > guessing.
> The interpreter itself doesn't depend on 'native' at all. The base
> system runs fine without it.
> Only add-ons like floating point math, or the OpenGL library, do need
I think PicoLisp is plenty fun and useful also without these addons.
Floating point could be reimplemented in other ways if really needed.