Alexander Burger <> writes:

Hi Alex,

thanks a lot, thats what I needed to know, now I have to give it a try. 

>> 3. Is it possible to use 'prog' or 'let' with 'apply', i.e. apply a
>>    whole sequence of functions instead of only one to the 'lst argument?
> I'm not sure what you mean here. Perhaps it helps to know that the
> mapping functions take an arbitrary number of lists? Can you give an
> example?

I will try to get as far as I can and then maybe ask again with a better
specified question. 



Reply via email to