On 10/05/2013 16:19, Alexander Burger wrote:
you cannot do TCE while interpreting List structures. You have to do it in the compiler, as it requires some analysis of the code structure.
One could always look ahead and try to analyse the s-expression's structure while executing it... this probably wouldn't perform very well though.

I think we are thinking the same thing, just from different perspectives :). You could conceivably write an interpreter for pure list data that eliminated tail calls, because you can write an interpreter that can do anything, but it wouldn't be an optimisation because of the extra overhead.

Please avoid the term "dynamic scope". There is no such thing in PicoLisp. PicoLisp has "dynamic binding".
Indeed, sorry about that.

Still, using the correct term, unless I'm gravely mistaken the presence of it necessarily forbids one from even considering general TCE, as it would demand messing with the bindings at the wrong times.

Anyway, I think PicoLisp's incredible dynamic programming power can probably supply better solutions than asking the interpreter to do TCE for you (e.g. a self-compiling function that you define in recursive form and rewrites itself to use iteration the first time it runs; I have no idea to do this but I'm sure someone already has).

UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to