Hi, I compiled those binaries just following the instructions, nothing special. I work on different OS's (thus those binaries), and compiled on each environment: cygwin, centos 32 and 64bit, and OSX (snow leopard). The names of the links on my blog are misleading -- my mistake. I just corrected them.
For OSX, I don't remember exactly, but I think I compiled with "emu" (Make emu), and that's probably why it's so slow. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jon Kleiser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Keith, > > I've done some more testing of your 64-bit PicoLisp on my old MacBook Air, > with OSX 10.8.5. When I run the "fibo" test, however, I get results that > are somewhat "alarming": > > : (== 64 64) > -> T > : (de fibo (N) (if (>= 2 N) 1 (+ (fibo (dec N)) (fibo (- N 2))))) > -> fibo > : (bench (fibo 33)) > 20.361 sec > -> 3524578 > > The same test using standard 32-bit PicoLisp runs a lot faster: > > : (bench (fibo 33)) > 2.136 sec > -> 3524578 > > What can be the reason for this huge difference? > > /Jon > > > Hello, > > > > I've uploaded pre-compiled picolisp for CentOS6 (32 and 64bit), OSX and > > Cygwin: > > > > > http://blog.keithkim.com/2013/11/pre-compiled-picolisp-for-centos-and.html > > > > Well, it's very easy and no trouble compiling them for anyone, but just > > for > > convenience. > > > > BR, > > > > Keith Kim > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe >
