On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 01:10:20PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > That's right. 'wipe' doesn't check for protected symbols. This could > indeed be improved. > ... > On the other hand, 'wipe' is typically called internally in database > manipulations, where efficiency is of primary concern.
OK .. I think I'm too paranoid about efficiency sometimes ;-) 'wipe' checks for protected symbols with 3.1.8.15 ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
