>> > tomas@x ~ % pstree | grep pi
>> > | |-zsh---pil---picolisp
>> > I can see pil in the process list but I would prefer if it was replaced
>> > by the picolisp process (aka shell exec).
>> This can be done with the (surprise!) 'exec' function
> On the other hand, if you need to use (fork) 0 for example because you
> want to inherit something from the parent pil process to the child - you
> can simply (bye) in the parent after forking the child.
my question is about the bin/pil shell script. Thinking about it now,
this script is not for production iirc, so an extra shell process is not
a problem actually.